The End of Lee’s Honeymoon

Source: 이재명

The Beginning of the DP’s Polling Woes

Last week we covered the recent challenges to the PPP and their failure to rebound following the short-lived martial law declaration in December of 2024. Lee Jae-myung and his Democratic Party (DP), who won the majority in the National Assembly in 2022 and the presidency earlier this year, have enjoyed an extended honeymoon phase with the South Korean public. Lee, after assuming the presidency, has benefited greatly from his charismatic charms and strong polling numbers, dating back to his time in the National Assembly. President Lee has enjoyed a high approval rating, even when compared to predecessors at this point in their term, but for the first time Lee’s polling numbers have started to fall. Lee began his term as president with rather strong polling numbers, despite a slew of pending legal cases. The Democratic Party’s reputation has been unphased by any negative news. The South Korean President and leader of South Korea’s Liberal Democratic Party have seemed to have the right responses at every turn, at  least until recently. A series of scandals, resulting in various cabinet resignations, have rocked Lee’s administration. Lee’s administration is wrapped up in a new scandal seemingly every week, all while the Korean public continues to face serious issues with the economy and real estate. The fact that the corruption seen within the Lee administration tends to revolve around land development casts serious doubts on the abilities of the current government to address the nation’s most pressing issues. 

Scandal, Corruption, & Land Development

Late October saw the resignation of Vice Minister for Land and Infrastructure, Lee Sang-kyeong, the first resignation at this level of the Lee administration. Lee Sang-kyeong submitted his resignation due to his comments on the housing market, links to corruption, as well as the government’s changes to real estate regulations. As Lee Jae-myung entered office, it was widely understood that real estate and housing would stand as a major area of concern, and the burgeoning Lee government faltered at the first hurdle. Not only has the Lee government been unable to bring the housing market under control, but Lee has not been able to recruit the talent necessary to tackle such complex issues. The policies have not only failed but former Vice Minister Lee has been caught in his own real estate scandal. Down the road, perhaps even during next year’s nationwide elections, Lee Sang-kyeong’s resignation will be seen as the first wisps of smoke from a larger fire.

Land development has been the one ghost that the Lee administration cannot shake. Housing costs have been on the rise and rental costs have hit all time highs earlier this year. Lee’s government has tried to tame housing costs. As many of those who are in the process of either searching or purchasing an additional property then scrambled to complete their purchases before the new changes, which subsequently sent shockwaves through the rental market as fewer properties became available. The intention of these changes was good, but the policymakers did not fully consider the ramifications or public sentiment surrounding such a hot-button issue. 

Neofamilial Influence

The resignations continue as just a few weeks ago, we saw the resignation of Kim Nam-kuk, the Digital Communications Secretary, after allegations of influence peddling. The optics of Kim’s actions far out weight tangible harm done. This type of influence has been explored within South Korea, known as Neofamilialism. The idea behind Neofamilialism is that in the absence of a robust civil society, South Koreans turn to blood, hometown, and school ties for various forms of connection. While further work on Neofamilialism will be needed to understand the Korean society on a deeper level, Kim’s actions of peddling influence to other alumni of Chung-Ahn university fits a Neofamilial pattern. Lee has long turned towards his close group of advisors and colleagues, many of which date back to his days at the Judicial Research and Training institute. This group has long been described as the levee throughout various tides of Lee’s political career. When looking at Lee and his close group, you can see the proverbial high water mark through the group’s journey via their political careers. The group around Lee has stood by him and defended his actions through thick and thin, holding back the potential flood waters of scandals. But it would look as if Lee and his friends have finally met their match. 

Unification Church Scandal

A new scandal involving the Unification church has emerged, and with it Lee’s first major dips in polling. The most recent polls show Lee at 54.3% approval rating, the first major dip since taking office. Lee has ordered a full investigation into the Unification Church. The headquarters have been raided relating to the investigation and the leader of the Unification Church, and the leader, Han Hak-ja, has been jailed and questioned. while the church itself has declined to make a statement regarding the investigation. The results of the investigation are yet to be seen, but the effects are starting to ripple through the DP and Lee’s administration. 

The Unification Church is widely associated with the assasination of former Japanese Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, but the Church has been active in South Korea and Japan since the 1950’s. While the Unification Church was recognized as a cult in the 1970s. By then, it had spread its ideas and beliefs about its founder, Moon Sun-myung, as far as the United States. The history of the Unification Church is fascinating and will be the subject of an upcoming piece here at the Vivarium Group, so please check back in and give it a read!

Lee’s honeymoon period with the South Korean public is coming to a close. The rising costs of living, a stagnating domestic economy, and a suite of foreign policy issues, are starting to weigh on Lee’s formerly stellar polling numbers. 2026 will see national elections in South Korea that will serve as a de facto referendum on Lee and his party. The clock is ticking down to next June, Lee will only have 6 months to prove to the public that he and his party are the right choice to lead South Korea. 

The Bell Tolls for the PPP and South Korea’s Conservatives

The People’s Power Party (PPP) of South Korea could be in its final weeks, as the party has failed to recover from Former President’s Yoon declaration of martial law.  The PPP is facing two major scandals, one dealing with the unification church and the other regarding Yoon’s martial law declaration. Representative Kweon Seong-dong of the PPP was arrested on violations of the Political Fund law. It is alleged that the representative received more than $65,000 in bribes from the Unification church. Kweon had previously served as the acting leader of the PPP twice following the chaos of the martial law declaration in December of 2024.  The Democratic Party’s (DP) leader, Jung Chun-rae, has even called for the dissolution of the PPP should one of their members be convicted in one of the pending investigations of obstruction of the vote to lift Yoon’s martial law. Meanwhile President Lee Jae-myung and the DP are holding on to their popularity. Lee has seen a spike in approval ratings in the month of November following a successful meeting with US President Donald Trump and the conclusion of the  APEC summit. The most recent Gallup polls show Lee with a 60% approval rating. This remains one of the highest approval ratings at this respective point in the term. The DP has continued to have positive news cycles, where even if the DP may be up against more negative news, the members continue to have the right responses.

A New Start Would be Nothing New For South Korea’s Conservatives

Dissolution may be the only path forward for the conservative movement in South Korea. This type of restructuring is not uncommon to the conservatives, as the PPP was founded as recently as 2020. The People Power Party came about as the successor to the Liberty Korea Party, which dissolved as of February 17th, 2020. The Liberty Party had faced its own set of scandals with former President Park Geun-hye. The right wing of Korean politics is even further divided still. The People Future Party had broken away from the PPP and ran as a satellite party in the 2024 election, similar to how the United Future Party had split the conservative vote in the 2020 parliamentary elections. The political right in South Korea has been struggling for the last decade. No party has been able to put up a united vision for the future of South Korea. At a time where everyday Koreans are facing rising costs of living, and an increasingly competitive job market. The people of South Korea continue to reject a party that is stuck in the past. The party is split in their decision to defend former president Yoon. A fresh start with a clear focus on the future of Korea may just be what the political right needs to win in South Korean politics again. 

Japan’s First Female Leader: Challenges and Expectations

Japan’s Very Own Thatcher 

Continuing our Referendum Rundown, Japan’s political situation has become ever more precarious for the long standing LDP. After a drawn out election cycle, Japan has elected its first ever female leader: Sanae Takaichi. She has had a long career as a politician and served in the Abe Administration for years. Many are already calling her Japan’s Iron Woman. In fact, Takaichi has publicly mentioned her adoration for the late British Prime Minister, having drawn inspiration for her signature blue suits from Thatcher’s iconic blue suits of the 1980’s.. 

Read More

The One, Inescapable Problem with Export Economies

Technically, there’s more than one problem with export economies. But they all feed into each other, resulting in a much bigger and singular problem. To start, export economies rely on there being a party that is willing to import the exporter’s goods and services. Usually, the exporter can offer such things at equal quality (or better) than the importer can produce on its own, and at a better price too. The general argument for the benefits of international trade follow this logic, calling it a specialization in competitive advantage. However, this model assumes that the goal is to maximize the ability to consume, regardless of others consequences.

Read More

How South Korea Regulates and Protects Its Elections

Voting for the next South Korea president is already underway with early and shipboard voting having commenced earlier in the week. South Korea’s democracy is a major facet of what makes South Korea a success story. June 3rd will only be South Korea’s 21st presidential election. While it looked like Lee was going to win in a landslide, the conservative candidates have made some serious headway in the last few weeks. But we entered the polling blackout period, one of the many unique ways South Korea tries to regulate, protect, and promote its elections. Let’s take a look at some facets of Korea elections that make the system unique, as they are laid out in the Public Official Election Act (POEA).

Read More

Election Amidst an Economic War

A rundown of the 2025 Canadian election

The Canadian election has been a fascinating watch. At first glance, it would appear that we have seen one of the most drastic polling reversals in recent memory. I would rather argue that an unpopular leader left a popular party. While abruptness of this change has been fueled by an erratic foreign policy from Canada’s Southern neighbor, the change itself was set one way or another. The sudden and unpredictable nature of the new U.S. administration has trumped over most other issues in Canada. However, these issues will still plague whichever party comes out on top. 

Read More

Referendum Rundown

Welcome to our Referendum Rundown! Our new series on elections from around the world. This series will take a look at elections from around the world. Coverage will cover different aspects of elections including, candidate rundowns, predictions and implications, and results and analysis. Our election coverage will often have a foreign policy angle, as that is our expertise, and it ensures relevance to global audiences. My personal interest and expertise will mean that you can expect coverage to focus on Northeast Asia, specifically South Korea. However, my own intrigue will often lead me to explore  elections from around the pacific. In the coming days you can expect pieces previewing several key elections from around the Indo-pacific. Australia, South Korea, and Canada are all set to have elections in the coming weeks. While other states, like Japan, are inching their way towards a general election in the near future. 

In 2024, the world saw the most people in human history cast their ballots for their respective states. As we have come to see, democracy can be a fragile system.  We should stop and take the time to appreciate the time we live in. Millions of people get to have a voice in the government that rules over them. This concept would be unheard of just a few centuries ago. When each person gets a say in politics, politics becomes messy. The electoral process is  attempting to get a group of people to have a conversation and come to a decision. This conversation becomes increasingly complicated. It’s difficult to have a productive meeting with 5 people talking, let alone millions. This messy, complicated, and fragile system creates equally complicated, and at times, unexpected results. 

Whether or not we will ever see more people vote than in 2024 is yet to be seen. We are in a time of democratic backsliding across the globe, making each election increasingly important to watch. It is our goal to bring you along for the crazy ride that is a world full of vibrant elections from all around the world!

Can the US Withdraw From the United Nations?

What is the United Nations?

The United Nations (UN) is one of the most widely recognized institutions in the world, bringing together more than 190 nations. The bright blue of the UN has become an international symbol, quickly recognized on flags, boxes of aid, and on military uniforms.

The UN serves as a forum for nations to collaboratively tackle complex global problems with a nuanced, global solution. Every day, the United Nations works to create and enforce trade and regulatory frameworks, peace agreements, aid distribution, scientific collaboration, and more. Joining the UN brings a state into this wide network of resources, which includes major economic institutions like the International Monetary Foundation (IMF) and World Trade Organization (WTO).

The UN isn’t always thought of in such a positive light. It took Switzerland over 50 years to join! The United States has just pulled out of several large organizations within the UN, in a move seeming to distance the world power from the UN. This is not the first UN-skeptic move from the United States. In the early 2010’s, there were new calls for the United States to leave the UN. With the Trump administration being more transactional and isolationist in nature, this piece seeks to explore the potential for a US withdrawal, not only from the security council, but from the United Nations as a whole. 

Could the US seek to withdraw from the United Nations as a whole?

With the new administration, there may be an attempt by either Mr. Trump or his allies to withdraw the US from the UN. No country has ever withdrawn from the institution in its nearly 80 year history. There have been attempts to leave and even attempts to expel members. However, there is no formal mechanism to leave the UN, although the UN Charter does provide insight into when a member state can be expelled.  Article 6 of the UN Charter allows for the Security Council to recommend expulsion of a member, but it has never been invoked, despite the numerous opportunities that have presented themselves.

Prior Attempts to Withdraw from the United Nations

There was one instance of a country attempting to withdraw from the UN. Indonesia did intend to withdraw from the UN in 1965. A formal letter was submitted to the General Assembly stating Indonesia’s intent to withdraw from the organization. However, Indonesia would go through a violent change in government later that year. The government that would later rise to power would reverse course and remain a part of the UN. Ultimately, Indonesia is still a member of the UN and one of the emerging economies of the world. 

Concluding Thoughts

A formal withdrawal from the United Nations is extremely unlikely for any state, let alone a permanent member of the security council. There is one option that the Trump administration could pursue to further distance the US from the transnational organization. The United States could withdraw any and all funding from the United Nations, and even go as far as to stop sending and form of representation.

The Trump Administration has shown a propensity to withhold funding to various departments and organizations in just the first few weeks. This nuclear option has not been gaining any sort of meaningful traction, but it remains an option. No one can say for certain how the halls of the General Assembly would feel without an American presence, but there would be a large absence that is sure to be felt. As one example of the complications from a US withdrawal from the UN: one of two headquarters are located in New York City.

Further Reading

For more articles on US diplomacy, this article talks about a new book on Henry Kissinger’s global impact as a long-serving, leading US statesman: Kissinger’s Shadow: New Required Reading.

Violence in the Capitals – How the Seoul Courthouse Riot is Nothing Like January 6th

Chaos broke out at the Western Seoul District in the early hours of the morning on January 19th. They furiously ran through the court house, destroying and defacing everything in their path. The mob made it as far up as the 7th floor, where the judges’ offices are located. The staff that were working in the building at the time were forced to hide on the roof of the building behind a makeshift barricade. According to reporting by the Korea Times, 63 people have been arrested and formally charged for the violence at the Courthouse. Many traditional media sources, observers, and ordinary citizens are comparing the violence in South Korea, to the violence from January 6th 2021 in Washington DC. 

Read More

South Korean Democracy’s Largest Weakness

South Korea’s National Assembly has impeached a president for the second time in almost 7 years. (Background on that can be found in our prior missive.) South Korean President Yoon, former Prosecutor General, has found himself in a legally precarious position. He is facing 2 major investigations. The case focused on his impeachment from office will be heard by the constitutional court starting December 27th. The court has impeach presidents before, this is not uncharted territory. However, this is the first time ⅓ of the bench is vacant. Yoon’s martial law debacle has put the South Korean political system on full display, the good and the bad. The international community has heralded South Korea as one of the strongest democracies in Asia, especially after seeing how civil society reacted to the martial law declaration. However, Yoon’s declaration has exposed a critical flaw in South Korea’s democratic system – judicial appointments. 

Read More