Kissinger’s Shadow: New Required Reading

Kissinger’s Shadow has been heralded as one of the must-read books in political science and international relations for both students and the every-day history buff . In this piece we will review Kissinger’s Shadow, a monograph by Greg Grandin and see if it truly is a new standard in the field (spoiler: it’s an excellent piece of scholarship). Grandin is a very well published Professor, who taught at New York University before finding a new home at Yale. His research is originally grounded in Latin American history, specifically publishing The Blood of Guatemala. He has since expanded his research to encapsulate a larger international perspective. Outside of his monographs and teaching endeavors, he has continued to write extensively and serve on the board of the publication The Nation. 

Kissinger’s Shadow has been heralded as one of the must-read books in political science and international relations for both students and the every-day history buff . In this piece we will review Kissinger’s Shadow, a monograph by Greg Grandin and see if it truly is a new standard in the field (spoiler: it’s an excellent piece of scholarship). Grandin is a very well published Professor, who taught at New York University before finding a new home at Yale. His research is originally grounded in Latin American history, specifically publishing The Blood of Guatemala. He has since expanded his research to encapsulate a larger international perspective. Outside of his monographs and teaching endeavors, he has continued to write extensively and serve on the board of the publication “The Nation”. 

Kissinger’s Shadow picks up with a young Henry Kissinger, who is still a graduate student at Harvard. From his time as a student, Kissinger has a talent for creating and controlling narratives. His natural understanding of media as well as starting his research at such a prestigious university seemed to have made his transition to government work almost inevitable. Kissinger was able to waltz into the DC with his new fresh perspective. This book does a great job bringing the reader into the backrooms of DC and the decision making during the cold war. Specifically, I would say the source work regarding Kissinger’s time as NSC chair was fantastic. Grandin’s work on Southeast Asia stood out, as it was extremely well researched as well as tells a compelling cold war narrative. Grandin’s background in Latin America served him well, in the sense that his narratives around southeast Asia flow very naturally. He created a detailed story that allows readers who might be unfamiliar with the more intricate details to still follow along naturally. 

One of my favorite aspects of this book is how clearly it ties Kissinger and his actions to the present day. His discussions with Regan where the phrase “Well just fire all the bureaucrats” gets thrown around rings a little different in 2025. Moreover, Kissinger’s thoughts on Panama and its relationship to the projected power of the United States sound eerily familiar. Kissinger is a surprising figure in many ways, but his ability to stick around in Washington after his time in the White House jumped off the page at me. This extended all the way to Hilary Clinton invoking his name during her 2016 presidential run. 

Where this monograph does fall short is in its lack of discussion of US-China relations. Grandin does a phenomenal job demonstrating how Kissinger’s thoughts and philosophical  frameworks continued to shape the world into the 21st century. However, Kissinger’s work with China is notably absent. Kissinger and China are one of the most extensively covered topics, but with Grandin’s unique and detailed perspective it leaves just a little more to be desired. This omission leaves me wondering how Kissinger’s shadow was cast over the Middle Kingdom.  Considering how well researched of a figure Henry Kissinger is, I would not say the field is clamoring for more scholarship to be done. But if I were to recommend one area of research, especially for an audience that stretches beyond academia, would be Kissinger’s family life and his role as a husband and father. It would be fascinating to compare the themes Kissinger discusses in history and philosophy with how he parented. A realpolitik parenting style sounds chaotic to say the least. 

This book is a fantastic telling of one of the most complicated figures in American history. Should this be required reading? I would say so. Maybe not in the sense every single person needs to read this book. Rather, this book is a perfect companion to a 20th century history course. Kissinger’s shadow reaches every continent, making it a fascinating vehicle to explore world history. I would implore every reader of this book to use it as a springboard to start researching a new part of history. This book is beautifully researched and tells a captivating story, it can also lead you down a new path you may never have known was there. 

Election Amidst an Economic War

A rundown of the 2025 Canadian election.

The Canadian election has been a fascinating watch. At first glance, it would appear that we have seen one of the most drastic polling reversals in recent memory. I would rather argue that an unpopular leader left a popular party. While the rate of this change has been fueled by an erratic foreign policy from Canada’s southern neighbor, the change itself was set one way or another. The sudden and unpredictable nature of the new U.S. administration has trumped over most other issues in Canada. However, these issues will still plague whichever party comes out on top. 

Let’s take a look at the polling so far. We can see support for the Liberal party (in red) slowly gaining support since January 6th. The date of this poll was also the day Trudeau announced he was stepping down. Since his resignation, support for the Liberal party has only increased. 1

We do see several major spikes, each occurring on February 23rd, March 17th, and March 23rd. The news and polling is heavily driven by announcements made by U.S. President Donald Trump. The headlines during this timeframe are dominated by news about trade, specifically harm to the Canadian economy. Even when the election is formally underway, the news coverage of the election is dominated by the trade war. Looking at the election, the Liberal party continues to rise after seeing a change in leadership. 

Where we might have seen something change is with the Conservatives. As Poilievere’s image of being a Trump-esque figure has severely backfired. While this has expedited the shift to a Liberal advantage in the polls, I think this will quickly reverse once the election has concluded. The election will still be close, and there is a good chance that the Liberal party will enter into leadership without a clear mandate. The trade war has subsumed all other issues in Canada, including the housing crisis, the cost of living, and environmental issues. The Liberal party is fairing well in standing strong against Trump and his trade war but how they handle the domestic economy is still yet to be seen. Once in power, the new ruling party will have plenty of fires to put out, with the largest one looming across the southern border. 

  1. https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/elections/poll-tracker/canada/ ↩︎

Can the US Withdraw From the United Nations

The United Nations is one of the most widely recognized institutions in the world, bringing together more than 190 nations. The bright blue of the UN has become an international symbol, quickly recognized on flags, boxes of aid, or on military uniforms. The United Nations brings nations together to tackle complex global problems with a complex and global solution. Every day the United Nations works to create and enforce trade and regulatory agreements, peace agreements, aid distribution, scientific collaboration, and more. Joining the UN brings a state into this wide network of resources, that includes major economic institutions like the IMF and WTO. 

The UN isn’t always thought of in such a positive light. It took Switzerland over 50 years to join! The United States has just pulled out of several large organizations within the UN, in a move seeming to distance the world power from the UN. This is not the first UN skeptic move from the United States. In the early 2010’s there were new calls for the United States to leave the UN. With the Trump administration being more transactional and isolationist in nature, this piece seeks to explore the potential for a US withdrawal, not only from the security council, but from the United Nations as a whole. 

Could the US seek to withdraw from the United Nations as a whole? There may be an attempt by either Mr. Trump or his allies to remove the US. No country has ever withdrawn from the nearly 80 year history of the institution. There have been attempts to leave and even attempts to expel members. The issue is that there is no formal mechanism to leave the UN. The UN Charter does provide insight into when a member state can be expelled.  Article 6 of the UN Charter reads as “A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.” However, this article has never been invoked despite the numerous opportunities that have presented themselves. In most recent history, there were calls by the US media to suspend or expel Russia from the UN due to its invasion of Ukraine. 

There was one instance of a country attempting to withdraw from the UN. Indonesia did intend to withdraw from the UN in 1965. A formal letter was submitted to the General Assembly stating Indonesia’s intent to withdraw from the organization. However, Indonesia would go through a violent change in government later that year. The government that would later rise to power would reverse course and remain a part of the UN. Ultimately, Indonesia is still a member of the UN and one of the emerging economies of the world. 

A formal withdrawal from the United Nations is extremely unlikely for any state, let alone a permanent member of the security council. There is one option that the Trump administration could pursue to further distance the US from the transnational organization. The United States could withdraw any and all funding from the United Nations, and even go as far as to stop sending and form of representation. The Trump administration has shown a propensity to withhold funding to various departments and organizations in just the first few weeks. This nuclear option has not been gaining any sort of meaningful traction, but it remains an option. No one can say for certain how the halls of the General Assembly would feel without an American presence, but there would be a large absence that is sure to be felt. 

Violence in the Capitals – How the Seoul Courthouse Riot is Nothing Like January 6th

Chaos broke out at the Western Seoul District in the early hours of the morning on January 19th. They furiously ran through the court house, destroying and defacing everything in their path. The mob made it as far up as the 7th floor, where the judges’ offices are located. The staff that were working in the building at the time were forced to hide on the roof of the building behind a makeshift barricade. According to reporting by the Korea Times, 63 people have been arrested and formally charged for the violence at the Courthouse. Many traditional media sources, observers, and ordinary citizens are comparing the violence in South Korea, to the violence from January 6th 2021 in Washington DC. 

Read More

South Korean Democracy’s Largest Weakness

South Korea’s National Assembly has impeached a president for the second time in almost 7 years. The former prosecutor has found himself in a legally precarious position. He is facing 2 major investigations. The case focused on his impeachment from office will be heard by the constitutional court starting December 27th. The court has impeach presidents before, this is not uncharted territory. However, this is the first time ⅓ of the bench is vacant. Yoon’s martial law debacle has put the South Korean political system on full display, the good and the bad. The international community has heralded South Korea as one of the strongest democracies in Asia, especially after seeing how civil society reacted to the martial law declaration. However, Yoon’s declaration has exposed a critical flaw in South Korea’s democratic system – judicial appointments. 

Read More